FAQ

FAQ

Preguntas que hacen los fotógrafos antes de presentar un caso sobre el uso de una imagen

These answers explain how Atlantic Image Defense LLC handles image monitoring, evidence, rights review, case resolution and international legal handoff. When a matter requires jurisdiction-specific legal action, it is coordinated with qualified counsel.

Send the image reference, suspected URL, date of discovery, original publication record and any available licence information. We review the factual context first, before recommending a next step.

Atlantic reviews the visual match alongside protected-work records, authority, licensing context, publication history and available evidence. The matter is classified only after that review has been completed and documented.

Useful material includes original files, RAW files where available, creation and publication dates, stock-platform records, invoices, licence records, screenshots, the complete suspected URL and any communication with the user or platform.

Atlantic manages rights, evidence and case administration under documented authority. If jurisdiction-specific legal advice, court filings or formal representation are required, the case record is prepared and handed to qualified counsel in the competent jurisdiction.

Yes. The workflow is designed for photographers and stock contributors who sell or license content through stock-image platforms and need better visibility over reuse, stronger records and a responsible process for reviewing suspected misuse.

Depending on the evidence available, the next step may be continued monitoring, preservation of evidence, a platform notice, a licensing discussion, no further action or preparation of a legal handoff file for qualified counsel.

Photographers, videographers, visual artists, stock contributors, agencies, publishers, studios, brands and authorized representatives of rights holders may submit a matter when they have a good-faith basis for believing that an image or visual asset is being used without proper authorization.

Yes, provided you are authorized to act for the rights holder, for example as an agency, assignee, licensee with enforcement authority, company representative, estate representative or appointed agent. We may ask for proof of that authority before reviewing or preparing material connected with an action.

Yes. A stock image may still require review if the use appears to fall outside a licence, if no proof of authorization is available, if attribution or licence scope is disputed, or if the image appears to have been copied from a photographer’s portfolio, publication or production context. A match on a stock platform does not, by itself, prove that the use is lawful.

We review that claim carefully. A valid licence may resolve the matter, limit any next steps or show that no claim should be pursued. Before making a practical recommendation, we may request licence details, transaction information, the image ID, account records, dates and the licensed scope of use.

Atlantic can prepare and administer platform, host or service-provider procedures supported by evidence and document the resulting case record. Any removal or disabling is carried out by the relevant provider, recipient or competent authority under the applicable rules and law.

Atlantic realiza una revisión documentada y basada en pruebas de los derechos, la autoridad, el contexto de licencia, las partes responsables, la jurisdicción y la exactitud factual antes de una comunicación relevante sobre derechos. Si el expediente sigue sin resolverse y respalda una escalada, el asunto puede avanzar por el canal de plataforma, asesoría o vía jurídica adecuado.

Where the documented rights, use, valuation basis and applicable law support it, Atlantic can administer an amicable compensation or retroactive-licence proposal and, if unresolved, prepare the matter for qualified legal escalation. Any judicial recovery is pursued through the competent legal process.

Registration is treated as a jurisdiction-specific rights record. Where relevant, Atlantic can organize supporting information for the rights holder or counsel. Formal filing and registration are completed through the competent authority by the rights holder or an appropriately qualified professional.

Los requisitos varían según el país y el tipo de actuación. En Estados Unidos, el registro puede ser importante antes de presentar determinadas demandas judiciales por derechos de autor y puede influir en las medidas disponibles. Para adoptar decisiones legales formales, los fotógrafos deben consultar a un abogado cualificado.

A copyright evidence file is an organized collection that may include protected-work records, screenshots, URLs, dates, publication history, licensing records, platform records, correspondence, integrity identifiers and a chronology of events. Its purpose is to make the factual and rights record easy to trace and review.

A screenshot on its own may be incomplete. The full URL, capture date, visible page context, surrounding text, indicators of commercial use and archived evidence help establish where and how the image appeared. Because online content can change quickly, early preservation matters.

You may, but it is often safer to preserve the evidence first. If the user removes or changes the page before documentation is complete, important context can be lost. If you have already made contact, provide the correspondence so it can be included in the timeline and reviewed.

A removed image may still be reviewable if you have screenshots, archived pages, server records, third-party captures, correspondence, invoices, platform notifications or other reliable documentation. The strength of the file will depend on the quality and credibility of the evidence that remains.

Yes. Monitoring can be organized around selected images, portfolios, stock content, campaign visuals or high-value assets. It can identify suspected reuse, but every match still requires review before any conclusion is reached.

Yes. We may review still images, video frames, thumbnails, promotional visuals, composite graphics and related visual assets. Depending on the case, the analysis may also require source files, project history, details of edits, typography, layout and proof of authorship or rights.

Yes. Removal of a watermark, credit, metadata or rights-management information may be relevant to a rights review. It should be documented carefully with before-and-after evidence, original files, publication records and screenshots of the suspected use.

A modified use may still be relevant. Cropping, colour changes, filters, overlays, compositing, AI-assisted edits or integration into a layout do not automatically remove rights concerns. The matter should be reviewed through image comparison, source history and the surrounding context of use.

Atlantic reviews lawful public sources relating to businesses, domains and platforms, and records both the source and the level of confidence attached to professional contact information used for case administration.

We can organize evidence and review material involving websites or users in different jurisdictions. Laws, procedures, limitation periods, platform rules and enforcement options vary by country, however, and formal legal action may require qualified local counsel.

Timing depends on the number of images and suspected URLs, the availability of source records, the complexity of the licensing context and whether additional documentation is needed. A straightforward initial review will generally require less work than a multi-image evidence file.

Avoid public accusations before the evidence has been preserved, aggressive messages sent without review, altered screenshots, incomplete or misleading information, or claims of ownership you cannot support. A defensible process depends on accuracy and proportionality.

Contact with a recipient or platform must remain within the documented service scope and be supported by verified authority, preserved evidence and the human authorization recorded for the matter.

Tratamos los materiales enviados como información empresarial sensible destinada a revisión. Sin embargo, los formularios web ordinarios y el correo electrónico no son canales de seguridad perfecta. No envíe datos personales sensibles innecesarios, contraseñas, información de pago ni materiales jurídicamente privilegiados salvo que se haya confirmado un procedimiento adecuado.

Submitted matters are assessed against protected-work provenance, authority, observed use, licence context, evidence quality, jurisdiction and the action requested. That assessment determines whether the record proceeds, requires clarification, is corrected or is closed.

A stronger file usually contains original source material, a clear publication history, reliable dates, complete URLs, screenshots in context, licensing records, proof of authorship or assignment and a factual chronology that can be reviewed by a platform, counterparty or counsel.

Atlantic gives priority to clear protected-work provenance, documented authority, complete source and occurrence references, preserved observations, licensing history, publication chronology and corroborating records that allow recipients, platforms, counsel or competent authorities to trace the case.

Yes. We can organize a legal handoff file containing the facts, evidence, chronology, URLs, screenshots, ownership material, licensing context and unresolved questions. The attorney remains responsible for legal advice, strategy and formal representation.

Atlantic applies documented security controls, preserves evidence, requires human review and manages cases with regard to jurisdiction. Resolution may proceed through licence verification, amicable terms, provider procedures or referral to qualified legal counsel; judicial outcomes are determined through the competent legal process.

Use the Submit a Case form or contact us by email. Provide the suspected URL, image reference, basis for your ownership or authority, date of discovery and any available licence or publication records.
Preguntas avanzadas y limitaciones

Cómo evalúa Atlantic la autoridad, las pruebas y la progresión internacional del expediente

Esta guía ampliada explica el enfoque de Atlantic sobre autoridad, supervisión, pruebas, licencias, respuestas del destinatario, notificaciones, pagos, conservación y progresión internacional de expedientes, incluida la remisión a asesoría jurídica cualificada cuando un asunto requiere acción legal específica de una jurisdicción.

  1. 01Autoridad
  2. 02Pruebas
  3. 03Licencias
  4. 04Notificaciones
  5. 05Respuestas
  6. 06Conservación
  7. 07Jurisdicción
01

¿Cómo verifica Atlantic la autoridad del titular de derechos?

Atlantic revisa el expediente de la obra protegida junto con la documentación disponible sobre autoría, titularidad, cesión, agencia y mandato pertinente al caso. El registro de autoridad resultante se utiliza para determinar si Atlantic dispone de una base documentada para administrar el asunto y qué derechos y territorios están incluidos.

Un archivo de origen es importante, pero puede necesitar corroboración mediante el historial de publicación, contratos, testigos, registros de colaboradores o inscripciones.

02

¿Una puntuación de similitud alta prueba una infracción?

La similitud es un punto de partida probatorio para la revisión documentada. La calificación del expediente considera indicadores de acceso y copia, titularidad y autoridad, alcance de licencia, excepciones aplicables, jurisdicción, contexto de daños y responsabilidad de publicación junto con el registro preservado.

Un revisor debe examinar la imagen, la página y los registros de derechos disponibles.

03

¿Cómo se autorizan las notificaciones externas?

Las notificaciones externas relevantes requieren autorización humana documentada y un expediente suficientemente completo. La vía de notificación elegida se adapta a la plataforma pertinente, al marco legal, la jurisdicción y las pruebas disponibles, incluido cualquier procedimiento de contranotificación aplicable.

Una notificación incompleta o inexacta puede perjudicar al solicitante, al destinatario y a la plataforma.

04

¿Qué ocurre cuando el destinatario impugna la reclamación?

La impugnación se registra y el asunto vuelve a revisión. El destinatario puede aportar una licencia, identificar la entidad correcta, cuestionar la titularidad, explicar una excepción, corregir hechos o solicitar comunicación mediante un asesor.

Una controversia activa una revisión documentada de ambas posiciones y de sus registros de respaldo antes de mantener, corregir o escalar la evaluación del expediente.

05

¿Pueden eliminarse los datos inmediatamente?

El acceso a la cuenta puede suspenderse, pero puede ser necesario conservar registros probatorios, de auditoría, jurídicos, financieros y de seguridad. La eliminación permanente exige comprobaciones de dependencias, revisión de conservación y aprobación autorizada.

Los derechos de privacidad se gestionan conforme a la legislación aplicable y pueden estar limitados por reclamaciones jurídicas, contratos, seguridad y obligaciones de registro.

Referencias jurídicas e institucionales

Estos enlaces remiten a fuentes oficiales o institucionales. Su inclusión no significa que todos los textos se apliquen a todos los asuntos.

17 U.S.C. § 107 — Uso legítimo El uso legítimo es una limitación específica de los hechos que se evalúa mediante factores legales; una coincidencia técnica no resuelve ese análisis. Abrir la fuente oficial ↗ 17 U.S.C. § 512 — Notificaciones a proveedores de servicios en línea Los procedimientos de notificación y retirada contienen elementos formales, mecanismos de contranotificación y condiciones específicas de los proveedores de servicios. Abrir la fuente oficial ↗ Reglamento (UE) 2016/679 — RGPD Cuando resulte aplicable, el tratamiento de datos personales exige una base jurídica, transparencia, minimización y gestión de los derechos de las personas. Abrir la fuente oficial ↗ Convenio de Berna — Texto oficial de la OMPI La protección internacional de los derechos de autor se aplica mediante las leyes nacionales; las normas y los recursos aplicables varían según el país. Abrir la fuente oficial ↗

Atlantic administra flujos de gestión de derechos, pruebas y resolución de expedientes bajo autoridad documentada. Los remedios judiciales y las medidas coercitivas se tramitan, cuando corresponda, ante autoridades competentes y mediante asesoramiento jurídico cualificado.

Enviar una solicitud estructurada
Atlantic Image Defense LLC

Atlantic acompaña a fotógrafos y titulares de derechos mediante la supervisión de imágenes, la organización de pruebas, la revisión de licencias y la preparación responsable de casos.

Centro de confianza y transparencia

Empresa

Legal y confianza

Contacto

ATLANTIC IMAGE DEFENSE LLC
54 State Street, Ste 804
PMB 17418
Albany, NY 12207
Estados Unidos

contact@atlantic-image-defense.com privacy@atlantic-image-defense.com copyright@atlantic-image-defense.com
Presentar un caso

© 2026 ATLANTIC IMAGE DEFENSE LLC. All rights reserved. Active company registered in New York under DOS ID 7924876, Filing Number 260526002009.

Fabricado en Estados Unidos de América